Horne's argument against teaching Ethnic
Studies in Tucson Unified School District seems a little bit contradicting to
me. He argues that teaching Ethnic Studies classes such as raza studies
separates students and teaches them ethnic chauvinism. He say's that we try to
teach kids that it's not about what race he/she came from that it's about
his/her character and what he/she can and can't do. This point in his argument
right here seems to really make me think because he mentions individualism and
how they teach us to treat others as a individual, but yet taking a class that focuses
on your own race is unacceptable? Isn't learning about your own ethnicity and
where you came from a part of being individual? The social studies classes that
I have been in throughout my years of middle school and high school have seemed
to focus more on white history and barley touch on other ethnicity histories. I
think having classes that focus on certain ethnicity's provide students with
the opportunity to learn about where they came from and learn a little bit
about who they are. There is more than one race in this world and the thought
of not allowing students to learn about their own race seems absurd to me. If
the classes were only meant for the people of that race to take them then that’s
a different story, but these classes are open to whoever wants to take them and
aren’t restricted to one race only. If an African American student learned about
Chicano studies, they can learn about other cultures and find that they have
similarities. I think the classes are good because it teaches you to step out
of your comfort zone and also opens your mind to different cultures around the
world. Horne also kept mentioning the
same thing over and over about how we shouldn’t be teaching kid’s about the
downsides of history because it causes them to only focus on those things such
as being oppressed. When asked a question his go-to answer was that it would
cause students to start thinking about oppression. Michael, on the other hand,
felt that in order to celebrate our country for all its glory, we have to also
learn about the down sides too. The classes being taught in school now do not
teach a well rounded curriculum where we are able to learn about the full truths
of history. I think Michael had a better
developed argument on why we should allow ethnic studies classes because he had
a lot of valid reasons that contradicted Horne’s argument. Horne definitely did
not seem open minded to other opinions and kept on assisting that ethnic
studies classes would divide students up and cause them to be in favor of their
own race.
Word Count: 466
Hi Justina,
ReplyDeleteWow! Your blog post does such an insightful job of analyzing the arguments of Dyson and Horne as well as weaving in your own analysis of both. I also think that the '68 strikers would agree with your point that learning about the history and experiences of your race/cultural group is an important part of understanding your own identity- and celebrating it! It does seem that Dyson had a better arsenal of arguments prepared than Horne did, however I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that Horne's arguments are somewhat one-dimensonal to begin with ;)
--eas